On Good People: A New Defense of Rule-Consequentialism
نویسندگان
چکیده
139 words] Rule-consequentialism is an ethical theory that does a better job than any other of justifying our moral intuitions from a single overarching principle. My dissertation defends a novel formulation of this view as an account of a good person. First, I argue that a rule-consequentialist does “what a good person would do,” and that if everyone were like her, the world would be as good as possible. Second, good people sometimes do more than is required of them, and so a theory of the good person must explain supererogation, i.e. “going above and beyond the call of duty.” Third, I argue that rule-consequentialists have good reasons to embrace different moral codes for different societies. Finally, I show that it is fruitful to understand just war theory as a set of near-absolute constraints designed to minimize the horror of war.
منابع مشابه
Should Kantians Be Consequentialists?
Parfit argues that a form of rule consequentialism can be derived from the most plausible formulation of the fundamental principle of Kantian ethics. And so he concludes that Kantians should be consequentialists. I argue that we have good reason to reject two of the auxiliary premises that figure in Parfit’s derivation of rule consequentialism from Kantianism. In chapter 16 of On What Matters,...
متن کاملDeontology * David A. Mcnaughton and J. Piers Rawling
Which actions does morality require of us? What does it forbid and what does it permit? In trying to fi nd some general answers to these questions, moral theorists typically start from commonsense morality, from what ordinary people think about moral issues. In deciding how to act, people often think about the consequences of their actions: they try to fi nd the action that leads to the best ov...
متن کاملHow to be a consequentialist about everything
Over the last few decades, there has been an increasing interest in global consequentialism. Where act-consequentialism assesses acts in terms of their consequences, global consequentialism goes much further, assessing acts, rules, motives — and everything else — in terms of the relevant consequences. Compared to act-consequentialism it offers a number of advantages: it is more expressive, it i...
متن کاملThe Challenges and Strategic Imperatives of Nigeria’s Defense and Internal Security Measures since the Fourth Republic
The year 1999 marks a remarkable turnaround in Nigeria’s history and bid for global reckoning as a democratic nation having grappled with a sustained military rule for many decades after her independence. However, with the country’s return to democratic rule, many teething problems evolved which of course is not strange to young and emerging democracies such as Nigeria’s particularly after many...
متن کاملConsequentialism and Actual Rules 0. Introduction
After considering some problems facing exiting versions of consequentialism, I present the schematic outline of an alternative version of consequentialism, which I call Actual Rule Consequentialism (ARC). I then consider three ways in which one might attempt to ground ARC by deriving it from some more fundamental principle. The first attempt is to derive ARC from a principle of fairness, the se...
متن کامل